So here is the latest instalment, a thoughtful essay on a different kind of fall-out, and a salutary reminder that the consequences of military intervention last far beyond the end of hostilities...
War Without End
When I was working on my new novel Hell’s Ditch, set in the aftermath of a
nuclear attack, I watched Peter Watkins’ ‘after the bomb’ film The War Game. It touched on an aspect of
post-apocalyptic fiction that often gets overlooked: the psychological.
Along with
the physical casualties of nuclear attack in the film – victims of blast,
heat-flash or firestorm, and those suffering lingering deaths from body burns,
radiation poisoning, malnutrition and previously treatable disease, Watkins
also depicts thousands of survivors suffering ‘complex states of shock’
following their experiences – PTSD, as we’d call it now.
For most of
them, of course, the help they’d need would be sparse to non-existent. Similar
figures – ‘Spacers’ – appear in Robert Swindells’ 1985 novel Brother In The Land. The country will be
filled with the emotionally damaged and shattered, while the children growing
up in the aftermath are potentially feral or psychopathic.
There are
those who deride PTSD as a wholly modern phenomenon, the product of namby-pamby
liberal minds: “Trauma?” one former WWII soldier once said to me? “We didn’t
have any of that – we just came home and got on with things.” But coming home
and getting on with things doesn’t mean those problems don’t exist; they may be
better hidden, may resolve themselves differently, but they’re still there.
Throw that
into the mix, and then you also have to take into account a whole new way of
life, one that’s a desperate, non-stop struggle for survival. There aren’t any
supermarkets any more: food is in short supply. If you want to eat, you grow
it, forage it, catch and kill it, or you receive it as a reward for work. Those
are the grim realities of a society whose infrastructure has been shattered.
Everyone
is, in one way or another, mad; the lucky ones have simply found a brand of
neurosis or psychosis that can make a world like this bearable.
In a
country like America or Australia, with huge expanses of comparatively unspoilt
wilderness, it would be possible to escape the war and its after-effects – not
just the ruins, wreckage and corpses, but the awareness that they exist – and
start over. Before you can even begin healing from a trauma, getting yourself
out of that situation is essential. But in a small country like Britain, where
could you go? Nowhere would be untouched: wherever you fled, the ruins would be
there. Existing wildernesses would be contaminated; new wildernesses formed out
of the rubble and ashes. Wherever you looked would be the ruins of homes like the
ones you’d lived in, or dreamed of living in, of shops from which you’d once
bought the means of survival or acquired consumer goods you didn’t need with
money you didn’t have.
Everywhere
you looked, you’d be reminded of the people and the way of life you’d lost. You’d be in a state of permanent trauma,
and permanently surrounded by triggers. Small wonder, then, that in the world
of Hell’s Ditch people see ghosts: in
fact, almost everyone does. They take it for granted; they live with it, and
call it ‘ghostlighting’. Wherever you look, it brings the past alive; memories
awake, and come to prey on you.
Even with
the best will in the world, many who’ve managed to survive horrendous
experiences – the refugees fleeing Syria now, or survivors of the recent massacre
in Paris – will have memories that will haunt them for the rest of their lives.
Hell’s Ditch takes that to its
logical conclusion: everyone in this world is fighting a war without end.
No comments:
Post a Comment